Theoreti.ca

I came across this older article by Tom Jenkins from Globe and Mail that makes the case for investment in digital content. The article, It’s time for Canada’s digital revolution (Monday, March 2, 2009), is by Tom Jenkins, executive chairman and chief strategy officer of Waterloo’s Open Text Corp. He is also on the SSHRC council.

The Obama administration has made IT infrastructure and digital content a top and multibillion-dollar priority. The European Union has just launched a massive expansion in European digital content as part of its digital commercialization strategy. With only 1 per cent of Canada's content on the Web, we are falling behind the rest of the world as other countries pull ahead in the race to put their information online. Canada must keep pace in the fast-moving digital revolution. …

Library and Archives Canada, with strong support from the private and university sectors, has a plan to digitize Canadian content and is ready with the digital equivalent of a shovel-ready knowledge infrastructure project. It is time to implement. To succeed, we have to move quickly to take advantage of our strengths and opportunities.

This is the first public mention I’ve seen of an initiative to digitize Canadian content on a large scale. There has been discussion that OpenText (which got started with the New OED project) would support such a project. Let’s do it!

With my graduate students and colleagues I was involved in a number of papers at the SDH-SEMI The Society for Digital Humanities / La Société pour l’Étude des Médias Interactifs conference at Congress 2010 in Montreal. They included:

• “Exclusionary Practices: A Historical Look at Public Representations of Computers in the 1950s and Early 1960s” presented by Sophia Hoosien
• “Before the Moments of Beginning” presented by Victoria Smith
• I presented on “Cyberinfrastructure for Research in the Humanities: Expectations and Capacity”
• Text Analysis for me Too: An embeddable text analysis widget” presented by Peter Organisciak
• Daniel Sondheim talked about the interface of the citation from print to the web as part of a panel on INKE Interface Design.
• “Theorizing Analytics” was presented by Stéfan Sinclair
• “Academic Capacity in Canada’s Digital Humanities Community: Opportunities and Challenges” was presented by Lynne Siemens
• “What do we say about ourselves? An analysis of the Day
  of DH 2009 data” was presented by Peter Organisciak
• and I presented on “The Unreality of the Timeline” as part of a panel on temporal modeling at the CHA

As the papers get posted, I’ll blog them.

Historypin is a very cool project that lets people attach their historic photographs to locations. It is a partnership with Google that allows images to be pinned on Google Street View and Google Maps.

I like the scale and ambition of this project – it invites a country to document itself. I also like the way they have captured the concept with a name (“Historypin”) and an image of the historic photo pinned over the current view.

For those interested, there is a fair amount of information about Facebook and privacy. See, for example the EFFs timeline of Facebook’s privacy policies. They also have a video (and instructions) on how to opt out of Instant Personalization. That’s if you can’t bear to quit entirely.

Matt McKeon has an animated visualization of the change in privacy from 2005 to now.

Jeff Jarvis has a nice long blog post on Buzz Machine on Confusing *a* public with *the* public. He makes the point that what we liked about Facebook was that we could control who our public was (who our circle of friends is.) He argues that Facebook confused our willingness to share information with a small public with a willingness to share with a large and corporate public. That is the promise of a social presence site – that it lets you control who you want to see what. Ning gets it, though the site is slow. I’ve used Ning to create family private networks.

From Twitter I discovered Facebook’s Gone Rogue; It’s Time for an Open Alternative on Wired.com by Ryan Singel.

Facebook has gone rogue, drunk on founder Mark Zuckerberg’s dreams of world domination. It’s time the rest of the web ecosystem recognizes this and works to replace it with something open and distributed.

Ryan Singel is right. It is time to replace Facebook. They have decided that privacy is overrated and that their audience doesn’t care. They may be right, but those of us who do care need to vote with our feet (or fingers.) The first step is deactivating Facebook.

I’ve stayed on Facebook, despite the fact that I rarely check it, because old friends have found me on it (and it sends me an email when they befriend me.) It seems that my generation all started joining Facebook a couple of years ago and through it I got in touch with old school friends. That’s the power of social sites like Facebook – their value to us grows as more and more people join. When it was just youth on Facebook it was more of a curiousity, but now that it has become popular across generations, it is harder to quit. After all my long lost California cousins now stay in touch with me on Facebook. Thus Facebook has us where we are afraid to lose our online social presence if we close our account, which is why they can start monetizing our privacy. Singel has convinced me that they have deliberately made that choice.

For this reason I think we have to start deliberately deactivating our accounts, despite the social outcomes (which, to be fair, are not that great when you really think about it.) Deactivating is a message itself about privacy and the social that you send to others on Facebook. If enough people deactivate, the value of Facebook drops for others, which would probably panic Facebook into changing their policy. Imagine if word got out that people were dropping off Facebook – just the perception that it was no longer “the place to be” would threaten its business model. Social media depend on the perception of growth, for which reason they should fear a movement to drop out.

Now I have to figure out how to gracefully quit Facebook.

I’m at a conference organized by Jerome McGann, Online Humanities Scholarship: The Shape of Things to Come: Schedule at the University of Virginia. The focus is on sustainability and Mellon is supporting the conference. My conference report is at http://www.philosophi.ca/pmwiki.php/Main/ShapeOfThings.

Thomas Crombez on his Doing Digital History site has a post on Publishing scholarly projects using Google Sites « Doing Digital History. His argument and instructions make a lot of sense. The idea is that you use something like TEI to encode your scholarly data and then you publish it on Google Sites instead of setting up something fancy at your university or lobbying for research infrastructure that doesn’t exist. Google provides stable infrastructure that you don’t have to maintain at an unbeatable price that is “off-campus” (which can have advantages) and which is as likely to survive as a university service.

Either way — running your website on a university server, a private hosting solution, or your own server — you are basically into self-publishing. Will you use an established platform aka CMS (Content Management System, e.g., WordPress or Drupal) or do you prefer to grow your own HTML/CSS? What is the most advantageous and flexible place to host it? If you run your own server, when does it need to be updated? Do you really need that latest Apache update? If you are doing a dynamic website, will the database continue to behave as it does today? When to update your database software? Is it possible that your website will one day attract a lot of traffic, necessitating more than one server? What search engine do you use for your collection of texts? Do you simply plug in a Google search box, or do you want some more searching power for your users? If so, what software do you choose?

I see more and more people moving to Google (and other commercial solutions) as a way of doing projects quickly and with modest resources. I call it Computing With The Infrastructure At Hand.

Thanks to HUMANIST I came across the UK Digital Curation Centre which is creating a great site on digital curation and preservation. They have short briefing papers that are great starting points on issues like persistent identifiers and they have a partly completed manual with in-depth information.

ars technica has a good summary of the Kaiser Family Foundation Report: Generation M2: Media in the Lives of 8-18-Year-Olds. Their story, Kids consume media as a full-time job—many getting overtime (Chris Foresman, Jan. 21, 2010) ends with some good news,

The report notes that kids spend less time reading magazines or newspapers, though online reading has supplanted that to some degree. However, the average time spent reading books has stayed relatively steady, at about an hour per day. Only the heaviest of media users reported increases in poor grades or low levels of personal contentment. And it seems parents that are active about placing restrictions on media use have kids that consume significantly less media than kids without restrictions. Leaving the TV off, limiting hours of TV, video game, or computer use, and having rules about types of content all help curb media use. One final bit of good news: kids on average spent almost two hours a day engaged in physical activity, up slightly from five years ago.

The bad news is that media consumption is becoming a full time job for kids taking up all the time they are asleep or at school. Is there anything other than media consumption?

Fast Company has an interesting graphic to show the “Rise of Digitization in the U.S.” See their article, File Under: Machines, Rise of the. The infographic by Rob Vargas is based on information from the Census Bureau recent Statistical Abstract of the United States.

Thanks to Stéfan for this.